A full-day workshop on protecting the conditions under which people and groups reason for themselves as generative and agentic AI reshape attention, belief, memory, judgment, and agency.
As generative and agentic AI become embedded in search, education, companionship, and decision support, a class of risk emerges that we lack a shared way to name, test, and govern: a single model output may be accurate and disclosed, yet the risk lies in how systems shape attention, belief formation, memory, judgment, and agency across many interactions — and how they reshape collective sensemaking.
CogSec proposes cognitive security — the integrity of the conditions under which people and groups reason for themselves — as a research agenda between HCOMP (AI-assisted decision-making, over- and under-reliance, oversight) and CI (misinformation, deliberation, civic decision-making). The day is anchored by a hands-on session that builds the Cognitive Vulnerability and Mitigation Catalog (CVMC): a schema pairing each AI affordance and cognitive vulnerability with a candidate mitigation, evaluation metric, burden-and-equity check, and governance hook. Attendees leave having co-authored catalog entries and a community roadmap.
The workshop's deliberate spine is the CVMC and the measurement of cognitive over- and under-reliance. The remaining themes are application surfaces.
Attention (epistemic flooding, attentional capture); belief and judgment (fluency overtrust, authority transfer, personalized persuasion); memory and provenance (context collapse, source confusion); learning (cognitive offloading, skill atrophy); agency (automation deference, emotional dependency, agentic misalignment).
Over- and under-reliance, appropriate reliance, and calibration in AI-assisted decision-making; longitudinal and ecological evaluation; metrics for conversion, persistence, dependence, provenance, calibration, and skill retention.
Misinformation and influence operations, polarization, content moderation and governance, deliberation, prebunking and inoculation, and civic decision-making.
Crowdsourced verification, source credibility, provenance and content authenticity, and deepfake and synthetic-media detection.
Frictional and cognitive-forcing design; auditing, red-teaming, incident reporting; and alignment to standards (NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001).
Mixed groups of 4–6 each take a deployed AI affordance and draft a catalog entry end to end: affordance → vulnerability → failure pattern → mitigation → metric → burden-and-equity check → governance hook. Every attendee leaves with an artifact.
A full day with coffee breaks and lunch. Each accepted paper is a four-minute lightning talk. All times are Eastern. Updated Sunday 12:30 pm: Panel 2 stays at 1:30, and Lightning talks III now follow it at 2:15. Abstracts, posters, and papers are on the papers page.
Setting the cognitive-security agenda for the day.
Jin-Hee Cho, Virginia Tech, Trustworthy Cyberspace Lab.
Four minutes each plus one minute of questions.
Brett Frischmann (Villanova) and Ujwal Gadiraju (TU Delft). Moderated by Harram Mansoor. Cognitive-forcing functions, microboundaries, and seams.
Four minutes each plus one minute of questions.
Boxed lunches are in the 5th-floor lobby and are included with workshop-day registration.
Nick Caputo (Johns Hopkins), Ryan Boyd (Vanderbilt, joining remotely), and Pat Pataranutaporn (MIT Media Lab, joining remotely). Moderated by Andy Haupt, remotely. Persuasion, prebunking, and what works.
Four minutes each plus one minute of questions.
Groups of 4 to 6 each write one catalog entry in a shared doc, with a template and a worked example. One all-remote group on Zoom.
Each group presents its entry, 3 minutes each.
What we heard, what happens to the catalog entries, and how to stay involved.
Titles, authors, and abstracts for all 17 talks, plus posters and full papers from authors who provided them. See the papers →
The whole day runs on one Zoom link, emailed to registered participants. Remote speakers present live, and remote participants work together as one table in the CVMC Jam.
Panel 1 is moderated by Harram Mansoor and Panel 2 by Andy Haupt.

Virginia Tech · Computer Science
Jin-Hee Cho is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Trustworthy Cyberspace Lab. Her research spans trust management, information credibility, social network analysis, decision making under uncertainty, and cyber defense, including defensive deception. Before joining Virginia Tech in 2018, she was a computer scientist at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

Villanova University · Law, Business & Economics
Brett Frischmann is the Charles Widger Endowed University Professor in Law, Business and Economics at Villanova University. His research spans intellectual property, privacy, and technology law. With philosopher Evan Selinger, he co-authored Re-Engineering Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 2018). His recent work advocates friction-in-design to safeguard human capabilities and values. Also a workshop organizer.

Delft University of Technology · Web Information Systems
Ujwal Gadiraju is an Associate Professor in the Web Information Systems group at Delft University of Technology, where he directs the Delft AI Design@Scale Lab. His research spans human-computer interaction, AI, crowd computing, and information retrieval, with a focus on human-centered AI and appropriate human reliance on AI systems. He serves on the HCOMP steering committee.

Johns Hopkins School of Government and Policy
Nicholas Caputo is Assistant Professor of Frontier AI Governance at the Johns Hopkins School of Government and Policy and Law & AI Lead at the Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative. He studies how law can govern artificial intelligence and how AI can improve legal and administrative institutions, drawing on constitutional and administrative law and technical work in AI alignment.

Vanderbilt University · College of Connected Computing
Ryan L. Boyd is an Assistant Professor in the College of Connected Computing at Vanderbilt University. A psychologist and computational social scientist, he studies mental health, personality, values, and social relationships through the computational analysis of language. He also examines large language models as objects of psychological study and has worked on the LIWC text analysis software since about 2014.

MIT Media Lab · Cyborg Psychology
Pat Pataranutaporn is an Assistant Professor of Media Arts and Sciences at the MIT Media Lab, where he directs the Cyborg Psychology group and co-directs the Advancing Humans with AI program. His group studies how AI reshapes cognition, emotion, and behavior, including emotional dependence on AI companions, cognitive manipulation, and false memory implantation. His Future You project, an AI digital twin for long-term thinking, has been used in more than 100 countries.
The call is now closed. CogSec brings together work on how AI-mediated systems shape — and can protect — human attention, belief formation, memory, judgment, agency, and collective sensemaking.
Short papers, position papers, demos, and datasets (non-archival) on measuring over- and under-reliance; the cognitive vulnerabilities above; persuasion and manipulation; misinformation, prebunking, and deliberation; crowdsourced verification and provenance; deepfake detection; frictional and cognitive-forcing design; and the auditing and governance of cognitive risks.
2–6 pages (excluding references) in the ACM Primary Article Template (LaTeX and Word versions available; an Overleaf template is also provided), or an extended abstract plus demo description. The call closed on August 17, 2026. At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present. Accepted work appears as a lightning talk and/or poster, and all participants join the hands-on session that builds the community CVMC. Review is single-blind — submissions need not be anonymized — with each receiving at least two reviews and organizers recusing from any conflicts; selection is lightweight (relevance, clarity, discussion potential).
The call closed on August 17, 2026 (AoE). Thank you to everyone who sent work. Decisions went out to all authors on August 20. All 17 accepted talks are in the program, with abstracts on the papers page. Authors can review their submission on EasyChair.
You do not need an accepted paper to take part. CogSec is open to anyone who registers, and the CVMC Jam is built so that every person in the room helps produce the catalog. Questions? Reach the organizers by email.
Register to attend → Email the organizers →CogSec runs on the HCOMP / CI 2026 workshop day, Sunday September 27, and you can register for the workshop day on its own without registering for the main conference. Workshop-day registration includes snacks and a boxed lunch; full-conference registration (Sep 27–30) covers the workshop day too.
| Workshop day | Early through Aug 28 | Regular by Sep 4 | Late after Sep 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student | $90 | $100 | $110 |
| ACM member | $125 | $150 | $175 |
| Non-member | $175 | $200 | $225 |
You do not need to submit a paper to attend; everyone is welcome. Late rates now apply. The workshop is hybrid, so remote attendance is an option.
Register → Rates & details →Organized with institutional backing from the Stanford HAI Cognitive Security Task Force.

Stanford HAI Cognitive Security Task Force · Stanford University · Lead organizer
Co-leads the Task Force and its speaker series; lead author of the CVMC work accepted at the 3rd Frictional AI Workshop (HHAI 2026) and the 2026 Trust and Safety Research Conference.

Villanova University
Widger Chair in Law, Business & Economics; co-author of Re-Engineering Humanity. Brings extensive convening experience from the Workshop on Governing Knowledge Commons.

Stanford University · Cognitive Security Task Force
Co-Lead of the Cognitive Security Task Force and co-author of the 2026 position paper AI Development Should Prioritize Cognitive Security.

Stanford HAI · Stanford Digital Economy Lab
HAI Postdoctoral Fellow (Ph.D., MIT CSAIL) researching human–AI evaluation, oversight, and platform incentives; previously with the U.S. FTC and the European Commission.

Inter-American Development Bank · IFI AI Working Group
Tech Lead of AI at the IDB and chair of the IFI AI Working Group, coordinating AI governance across international financial institutions and multilaterals; previously worked with DHS and Google on the interaction between AI systems and neurodivergent cognition. Her research examines how autonomous AI shifts the public-sector attack surface from access to belief.

University of Pennsylvania · Cognitive Security Task Force
Studies computer science at the University of Pennsylvania and serves on the Georgetown University Board of Regents, bringing an institutional-governance perspective alongside her technical work. A member of the Cognitive Security Task Force.